Timing of Budget Model Process


The call to develop a new budget model was shared with campus leadership in midspring 2018, about two months before a significant budget reduction as announced. The two activities, sometimes confused, are separate. A budget reduction lessens the amount of overall funds allocated across units, whereas the budget model changes how the allocation of those funds across units is determined. Importantly, a budget model does not cause an overall budget reduction and in fact, a well-designed budget model should prevent future budget reductions, or at least lessen their severity in extreme financial times.

Hundreds of hours of campus discussions, work sessions, research and collaboration with other institutions, model testing and review have been put into developing the new model for KU Lawrence. Interim Provost Carl Lejuez has led:

  • 4 town halls/campus conversations on the new budget model
  • Weekly meetings with leadership team, including deans
  • Weekly meetings with the Budget Model Working Group.
  • Regular meetings with University Governance senates, leadership, and executives
  • More than 100 small group and individual meetings around campus
  • Faculty/staff assemblies and chairs meetings
  • Nine stakeholder advisory board meetings, both internal and external.

A look at the budget model development and implementation process includes a look at what has already transpired and a look toward what remains to be implemented. As KU implements portions of the Priority Centered Management model, it will be informed by an annual calendar characterized by major recurring administrative activities.

Content of image is explained in "Annual Calendar" text below.

[enlarge image]

Annual Calendar

January

  • Metrics Analysis
  • Prep for Presentations

February

  • Metric Presentations
  • Phase 1 of Budget Prep Due (PBCS)

March

  • Draft Budgets Received by 3/1
  • Performance Evaluations Due
  • Final Budgets Received by 3/15
  • Course fee changes due by 3/25

April

  • Phase 2 of Budget Prep Due (PBCS)
  • Tuition Proposal to KBOR

May

  • KBOR Tuition Proposal — First Read

June

  • KBOR Tuition Proposal — Second Read
  • Fiscal Year End

July

  • Fiscal Year Start
  • Carryforward Meetings

Fall

  • Centrally generated metrics available

The budget model will eventually develop into a sustained cycle of activites related to data collection, evaluation and budget-setting activities. During the beginning years of the PCM budget model roll-out, the timeline of allocation-related activities will look different as new portions of the PCM budget model are enacted.


Budget Model Year FY20

FY20 budget timing
Calendar YearMonthBudget-related Activities
2019JulyFY20 starts
 August 
 SeptemberAIR begins compiling centrally generated AU metrics
 October 
 NovemberFY18 SU data to processing
 DecemberFY19 SU data to processing
2020January2019 AU metrics available to evaluate progress toward Strategic Metric Evaluation
 February

Deans present on subjective metrics for evaluation

Add'l metrics planning (VP, OAC, Finance Team)

 MarchAnticipated FY21 AU budget announced, feedback received
 April

FY19 SU data available to central

FY21 budget set

Tuition proposal submitted to KBOR for consideration

 May

 

 June

FY18 SU data available to AIR for analysis

KBOR approves final tuition proposal


Budget Model Year FY21

(Guardrails in place for AU)

FY21 budget timing
Calendar YearMonthBudget-related Activities
2020JulyFY21 starts
 AugustSend FY 20 SU data for benchmarking
 September

Budget Compact/Carryforward meetings

AIR begins compiling centrally generated AU metrics.

 OctoberFY18 & FY19 SU data available to units
 NovemberFY18 SU data to processing
 DecemberFY20 SU data available to units
2021January 
 February

Present FY20 data

Deans/VPs present on subjective metrics for evaluation

Add'l metrics planning (VP, OAC, Finance Team)

 MarchAnticipated FY22 AU budget announced, feedback received
 April

FY22 budget set

Tuition proposal submitted to KBOR for consideration

 May

 

 June

KBOR approves final tuition proposal


Budget Model Year FY22

(Guardrails in place)

FY22 budget timing
Calendar YearMonthBudget-related Activities
2021JulyFY22 starts
 AugustSend FY21 SU data for benchmarking
 September

Budget Compact/Carryforward meetings

AIR begins compiling centrally generated AU metrics.

 October 
 November 
 DecemberFY21 SU data available to units
2022January 
 February

Present FY21 data

Deans/VPs present on subjective metrics for evaluation

Add'l metrics planning (VP, OAC, Finance Team)

 MarchAnticipated FY23 budget announced, feedback received
 April

FY23 budget set

Tuition proposal submitted to KBOR for consideration

 May

 

 June

KBOR approves final tuition proposal


Budget Model Year FY23

(Guardrails in place)

FY23 budget timing
Calendar YearMonthBudget-related Activities
2022JulyFY23 starts
 AugustSend FY22 SU data for benchmarking
 September

Budget Compact/Carryforward meetings

AIR begins compiling centrally generated AU metrics.

 October 
 November 
 DecemberFY22 SU data available to units
2023January 
 February

Present FY22 data

Deans/VPs present on subjective metrics for evaluation

Add'l metrics planning (VP, OAC, Finance Team)

 MarchAnticipated FY24 budget announced, feedback received
 April

FY24 budget set

Tuition proposal submitted to KBOR for consideration

 May

 

 June

KBOR approves final tuition proposal


Budget Model Year FY24

FY24 budget timing
Calendar YearMonthBudget-related Activities
2023JulyFY24 starts
 AugustSend FY23 SU data for benchmarking
 September

Budget Compact/Carryforward meetings

AIR begins compiling centrally generated AU metrics.

 October 
 November 
 DecemberFY23 SU data available to units
2024January 
 February

Present FY23 data

Deans/VPs present on subjective metrics for evaluation

Add'l metrics planning (VP, OAC, Finance Team)

 MarchAnticipated FY25 budget announced, feedback received
 April

FY25 budget set

Tuition proposal submitted to KBOR for consideration

 May

 

 June

KBOR approves final tuition proposal


Longer-range

The Budget Office and senior leadership will continue to monitor the Priority Centered Management Model for effectiveness and its ability to achieve expected outcomes. Over time, the academic unit formula as well as the support unit formula are expected to reach a state of balance that will allow the guardrail step to be discontinued.

The amount set aside for subsidy will be reviewed regularly and may be decreased as more academic units are able to respond more nimbly to changing conditions and needs within their disciplines.