• Home
  • Table 3. Faculty: Comparison of Mean Responses for Male – Female and Minority – White Faculty

Campus Climate Study

Equity Study Committee Report March 2001


Navigation

Report Index
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Table 1: Faculty Response Rate by Sex, Ethnicity and Unit
Table 2: Unclassified Staff Response Rate by Sex, Ethnicity and Unit
Table 3: Faculty: Comparison of Mean Responses for Male – Female and Minority – White Faculty
Table 4: Female Faculty: Mean Responses in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity
Table 5: Faculty of Color: Mean Item Responses in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity
Table 6: Faculty: Top Five Issues of Concern and Five Issues of Least Concern
Table 7: Unclassified Staff Mean Item Responses by Sex and Race/Ethnicity
Table 8: Unclassified Staff: Female Item Means in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity
Table 9: Minority Unclassified Staff Item Means in Descending Order of Perceived
Responses to the Equity Study


Table 3. Faculty: Comparison of Mean Responses for Male – Female and Minority – White Faculty

Item

No.

Item

All

Male

S.D.

Female

 

S.D.

Faculty of

Color

 

S.D.

White

S.D.

1

P&T methods/university

2.36

2.25

0.63

2.58

*

0.92

2.88

*

1.01

2.29

0.68

2

Communication of mthds/stds for P&T/univ

2.37

2.26

0.67

2.59

*

0.96

2.74

*

1.05

2.32

0.74

3

P&T implementation / university

2.31

2.22

0.57

2.49

*

0.84

2.66

*

0.90

2.26

0.64

4

Flexibility of P&T timelines/university

2.26

2.17

0.58

2.44

*

0.87

2.59

*

0.98

2.22

0.64

5

Formal recognition

2.63

2.49

0.91

2.90

*

1.03

3.28

*

1.33

2.54

0.89

6

University teaching awards

2.57

2.46

0.85

2.83

*

1.09

3.14

*

1.25

2.50

0.87

7

University research awards

2.49

2.42

0.90

2.65

 

1.05

3.06

*

1.29

2.41

0.87

8

Representation on committees

2.39

2.25

0.67

2.70

*

1.03

2.91

*

1.20

2.32

0.74

9

Mentoring junior faculty

2.45

2.27

0.71

2.82

*

1.08

3.16

*

1.16

2.37

0.81

10

Amount performance feedback

2.38

2.27

0.67

2.60

*

0.94

2.85

*

1.02

2.32

0.73

11

Communication opportunities w/unit leaders

2.32

2.22

0.67

2.51

*

0.90

2.63

*

1.06

2.28

0.71

12

Committee assignment

2.45

2.29

0.71

2.78

*

1.01

3.00

*

1.22

2.38

0.76

13

Evaluation methods for P&T/unit

2.41

2.28

0.71

2.66

*

0.99

3.03

*

1.20

2.33

0.74

14

Implementation P&T process/unit

2.30

2.21

0.60

2.48

*

0.93

2.84

*

1.13

2.23

0.64

15

Communication P&T standards/unit

2.29

2.20

0.61

2.48

*

0.89

2.61

 

1.09

2.25

0.66

16

Communication P&T process/unit

2.29

2.18

0.57

2.54

*

0.93

2.76

*

1.16

2.24

0.64

17

Encouragement to "go up" for promotion

2.43

2.24

0.66

2.84

*

1.13

3.00

*

1.19

2.37

0.82

18

Time in rank to full professor

2.31

2.15

0.50

2.68

*

1.09

2.65

*

1.03

2.27

0.73

19

Annual evaluation process

2.45

2.38

0.85

2.60

 

0.86

3.00

*

1.18

2.38

0.79

20

Merit salary process/unit

2.61

2.48

0.93

2.88

*

0.95

3.41

*

1.28

2.51

0.86

21

Teaching load

2.26

2.17

0.54

2.43

*

0.80

2.41

 

0.89

2.24

0.61

22

Teaching Assignment

2.26

2.14

0.47

2.50

*

0.91

2.58

*

0.96

2.21

0.60

23

Advising assignment

2.22

2.13

0.47

2.41

*

0.90

2.21

 

0.63

2.22

0.65

24

Research Requirements

2.34

2.23

0.62

2.54

*

0.98

2.64

*

1.10

2.30

0.73

25

Service requirements

2.42

2.28

0.73

2.67

*

0.98

2.73

*

1.17

2.38

0.79

26

Unit teaching awards

2.41

2.30

0.75

2.66

*

1.05

3.00

*

1.25

2.34

0.79

27

Unit Research Awards

2.38

2.33

0.81

2.51

 

1.00

2.91

*

1.24

2.32

0.81

28

Voice in unit

2.52

2.30

0.76

2.90

*

1.07

3.13

*

1.26

2.44

0.85

29

Hiring process

2.40

2.34

0.84

2.51

 

0.86

3.00

*

1.29

2.31

0.74

30

Unit climate

2.52

2.32

0.74

2.89

*

1.02

3.09

*

1.25

2.45

0.80

31

Support Allocation

2.37

2.26

0.73

2.58

*

1.04

2.77

*

1.11

2.31

0.80

32

Space allocation

2.41

2.31

0.81

2.61

*

0.98

2.83

*

1.22

2.35

0.81

33

Equipment allocation

2.44

2.32

0.78

2.69

*

1.04

2.89

*

1.23

2.38

0.82

34

Work environment

2.39

2.26

0.71

2.68

*

0.96

2.94

*

1.20

2.32

0.73

35

Flexible hours

2.17

2.10

0.42

2.31

*

0.77

2.61

*

1.09

2.11

0.43

36

Research startup

2.40

2.28

0.76

2.67

*

1.05

2.88

*

1.22

2.34

0.81

37

Grant development support

2.25

2.21

0.60

2.35

 

0.82

2.61

*

1.03

2.21

0.61

38

Instructional development support

2.23

2.17

0.54

2.34

*

0.80

2.61

*

1.05

2.18

0.55

39

Student respect

2.38

2.13

0.44

2.89

*

0.99

2.71

*

1.03

2.34

0.71

40

Collaboration

2.24

2.15

0.54

2.45

*

0.84

2.63

*

1.10

2.20

0.58

41

Annual raise

2.75

2.60

1.03

3.06

*

1.16

3.60

*

1.29

2.63

1.01

42

Benefits

2.21

2.15

0.55

2.33

*

0.83

2.52

*

1.03

2.17

0.59

43

Accommodation family issues

2.32

2.18

0.61

2.61

*

1.00

3.00

*

1.33

2.24

0.65

44

Tenure clock interrupt

2.18

2.07

0.38

2.43

*

1.00

2.56

*

1.15

2.14

0.58

45

No. Committee assignments

2.41

2.25

0.67

2.72

*

1.02

2.85

*

1.21

2.35

0.75

46

Unit research commitment

2.41

2.26

0.69

2.73

*

1.07

2.94

*

1.19

2.34

0.78

* Indicates the differences among averages of the groups being compared are statistically significant at the .05 level  on this and subsequent tables.

**S.D. = Standard Deviation on this and subsequent tables.

Responses included in analysis: 2=No Inequity, 3=Mild Inequity, 4=Moderate Inequity, 5=Severe Inequity on this and subsequent tables.

Office of the Provost
There are no upcoming events at this time.
Policy Library Search

Visit the Policy Office for more information.

Green Office

Why KU
  • One of 34 U.S. public institutions in the prestigious Association of American Universities
  • 26 prestigious Rhodes Scholars — more than all other Kansas colleges combined
  • Nearly $290 million in financial aid annually
  • 46 nationally ranked graduate programs.
    —U.S. News & World Report
  • Top 50 nationwide for size of library collection.
    —ALA
  • 23rd nationwide for service to veterans —"Best for Vets," Military Times