• Home
  • Table 5. Faculty of Color: Mean Item Responses in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity (N=39)

Campus Climate Study

Equity Study Committee Report March 2001


Navigation

Report Index
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Table 1: Faculty Response Rate by Sex, Ethnicity and Unit
Table 2: Unclassified Staff Response Rate by Sex, Ethnicity and Unit
Table 3: Faculty: Comparison of Mean Responses for Male – Female and Minority – White Faculty
Table 4: Female Faculty: Mean Responses in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity
Table 5: Faculty of Color: Mean Item Responses in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity
Table 6: Faculty: Top Five Issues of Concern and Five Issues of Least Concern
Table 7: Unclassified Staff Mean Item Responses by Sex and Race/Ethnicity
Table 8: Unclassified Staff: Female Item Means in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity
Table 9: Minority Unclassified Staff Item Means in Descending Order of Perceived
Responses to the Equity Study


Table 5. Faculty of Color: Mean Item Responses in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity (N=39)

Item

Equity Issue

Minority

 

S.D.

41

Annual raise

3.60

*

1.29

20

Merit salary process/unit

3.41

*

1.28

5

Formal recognition

3.28

*

1.33

9

Mentoring junior faculty

3.16

*

1.16

6

University teaching awards

3.14

*

1.25

28

Voice in unit

3.13

*

1.26

30

Unit climate

3.09

*

1.25

7

University research awards

3.06

*

1.29

13

Evaluations methods for P&T/unit

3.03

*

1.20

12

Committee assignments

3.00

*

1.22

17

Encouragement to "go up" for prom. to full professor

3.00

*

1.19

19

Annual evaluation process

3.00

*

1.18

26

Unit teaching awards

3.00

*

1.25

29

Hiring process

3.00

*

1.29

43

Accommodate family issues

3.00

*

1.33

46

Unit research commitment

2.94

*

1.19

34

Work environment

2.94

*

1.20

34

Unit Research Awards

2.91

*

1.24

8

Representation on committees

2.91

*

1.20

33

Equipment allocation

2.89

*

1.23

1

P&T methods/university

2.88

*

1.01

36

Research startup

2.88

*

1.22

10

Amount performance feedback

2.85

*

1.02

45

No. Committee assignments

2.85

*

1.21

14

Implementation P&T process/unit

2.84

*

1.13

32

Space allocation

2.83

*

1.22

31

Support allocation

2.77

*

1.11

16

Communication P&T process/unit

2.76

*

1.16

2

Comm of mthds/standards for P&T/university

2.74

*

1.05

25

Service requirements

2.73

*

1.17

39

Student respect

2.71

*

1.03

3

P&T Implementation

2.66

*

0.90

18

Time in rank to full

2.65

*

1.03

24

Research requirements

2.64

*

1.10

11

Communication opportunities w/unit leaders

2.63

*

1.06

40

Collaboration

2.63

*

1.10

35

Flexible hours

2.61

*

1.09

38

Instructional development support

2.61

*

1.05

15

Communication of P&T standards/unit

2.61

 

1.09

37

Grant development support

2.61

*

1.03

4

Flexibility of P&T timelines

2.59

*

0.98

22

Teaching Assignment

2.58

*

0.96

44

Tenure clock interrupt

2.56

*

1.15

42

Benefits

2.52

*

1.03

21

Teaching load

2.41

 

0.89

23

Advising assignment

2.21

 

0.63

Why KU
  • One of 34 U.S. public institutions in the prestigious Association of American Universities
  • 26 prestigious Rhodes Scholars — more than all other Kansas colleges combined
  • Nearly $290 million in financial aid annually
  • 1 of 9 public universities with outstanding study abroad programs.
    —U.S. News & World Report
  • 46 nationally ranked graduate programs.
    —U.S. News & World Report
  • Top 50 nationwide for size of library collection.
    —ALA
  • $260.5 million in externally funded research expenditures
  • 23rd nationwide for service to veterans —"Best for Vets," Military Times